Press Statement of Institute for American Studies of

DPRK Foreign Ministry

Pyongyang, August 18 (KCNA) -- The Institute for American Studies of the Foreign Ministry
of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea released the following press statement "To
bolster up self-defensive power for defending security environment of Korean peninsula and
region is urgent requirement of times" on August 18:
The U.S. and the ROK are going to stage Ulji Freedom Shield, large-scale provocative joint
military exercises, from August 19 to 29.
Even vassal countries affiliated to the "UN Command" will reportedly take part in the
exercises involving 48 rounds of various outdoor mobile trainings such as live firing and
landing drill on the sea and in the sky.
Thus, Ulji Freedom Shield fully betrays its dangerous colors as the biggest military training in
the Asia-Pacific region and offensive multinational muscle-flexing involving even NATO
member states.
The Institute for American Studies of the Foreign Ministry of the DPRK makes public this
press statement to disclose the rash confrontational moves of the U.S. and the ROK
escalating regional military confrontation and contradiction by kicking off such aggressive
large-scale joint military exercises despite strong internal and external opposition.

Is Ulji Freedom Shield "defensive" and "transparent"

A spokesperson for the U.S. Department of State recently termed the U.S.-ROK joint military
exercises "regular" and "defensive", touting their "transparency."
This is no more than rhetoric to cover up the dangerous and grave nature of their joint
military drills and evade international community's criticism.
It is clearly recorded in the world history of wars that in preparation for a war, aggressor
states followed a series of procedures, including adoption of war policy and military operation
plan for its execution, advance deployment of forces, ceaseless simulated and actual war
drills and war provocation.
The current U.S. administration has more openly pursued the policy of using nuclear
weapons against the DPRK by specifying the "end of regime" of the latter as a goal in its
"nuclear posture review" made public after its inauguration. It has put into practice its nuclear
confrontation policy against the DPRK by releasing the "Washington Declaration",
establishing a new U.S.-ROK "nuclear consultative group" and cooking up the "guidelines on
nuclear strategic plan and its operation."

According to them, nuclear-powered submarines of the U.S. frequented the waters near the
Korean peninsula in 2023, seven times as much as in 2022, and the number of flights of its
fighters and bombers in the sky above it has quadrupled. Against this backdrop, nuclear
carrier strike groups are being deployed there one after another along with massive
introduction of U.S. latest war hardware such as F-35 stealth fighters and SM-6 ship-to-air
interceptor missiles.
F-16 fighters, which had been stationed in the Kunsan air base, were moved to the Osan air
base near Seoul to form a "super-powerful wing." And U.S. offensive assets are
concentrated on areas near the southern border of the DPRK.
Worse still, the number of outdoor mobile training, staged as part of Ulji Freedom Shield,
increased to 38 in 2023 and 48 in 2024, and has turned into provocative special warfare
ones such special war training aimed at "occupation of Pyongyang" and "beheading
operation."
Notably, the current exercises, including a drill simulating a nuclear confrontation with the
DPRK, bring to light clearer the provocative nature of Ulji Freedom Shield as a prelude to a
nuclear war.
"Transparency" of the joint military drills touted by the U.S. is no more than trickery to
deceive the international community.
Most of the countries, which are to "observe" whether the U.S.-ROK joint military exercises
are staged in conformity with the requirements of the Korean Armistice Agreement, are
member states of the "UN Command" or NATO member states under the control of the U.S.
So it is clearly evident that it is utterly impossible to expect any neutrality or impartiality from
them.
All facts prove that Ulji Freedom Shield is neither "defensive" nor "transparent" but the most
offensive and provocative war drills for aggression in the world.

What impact have the U.S.-led joint military exercises had on international peace and
stability

It is the typical method of the U.S. to pursue its unilateral and absolute security by infringing
upon other countries' security and interests.
It is clearly evidenced by the fact that the U.S. and its vassal countries have staged more
than 200 joint military drills in the world annually and they have become more threatening in
their nature.

As for RIMPAC kicked off in 1971 against the former Soviet Union, the joint military
maneuvers didn't disappear despite the end of the Soviet-U.S. Cold War but have developed
into the world's biggest multinational maritime joint military drills under the pretext of
"defeating" new "virtual enemy."
From late July to early August this year, RIMPAC was staged in the largest-scale ever,
involving 40 warships, three submarines, 150-odd aircraft and 25 000 troops from 29
countries.
International security experts unanimously commented that the forms and contents of
RIMPAC clearly prove that they are aimed at laying siege to and deter China.
U.S.-led joint military drills are being staged frequently also in the European region,
distressed by the world's worst-ever security crisis brought by the Ukrainian incident, to
spark off great concern of the international community.
The U.S.-led joint military exercises Steadfast Defender were staged in the largest scale ever
since the end of the Cold War near the border of Russia from January to May this year with
the involvement of more than 90 000 forces, at least 50 warships including aircraft carriers,
80-odd fighter jets, over 1 100 combat vehicles.
The exercises, aimed at restoring the ever-dampening atmosphere of supporting Ukraine
among European countries and inducing them to increase military expenditure, fully show
the hostile intention of the U.S. to militarily deter Russia and seize the military hegemony in
the region.
It is the fact never to be concealed and denied that the U.S.-led joint military drills are the
grave root cause of escalating military confrontation and causing sustained instability across
the world.

What is the best way to ensure peace and stability

Shortly ago, the U.S. secretaries of State and Defense and the assistant to the president for
National Security of the White House, in an article they jointly contribute to the press,
betrayed the sinister intention to seize military hegemony in the Asia-Pacific region by
inveigling not only regional vassal countries including Japan and the ROK but also countries
outside the region.
This shows that the U.S.-led joint military drills have nothing to do with "preserving regional
security" touted by it and its allied forces but serve as a political and military means to take
more countries on the confrontation chariot driven by it to realize its hegemony.

Actually, major NATO members are taking part in the U.S.-ROK joint military exercises
recently under the signboard of member states of the "UN Command" and the military nexus
between Japan, the ROK and NATO is getting further tightened.
The U.S., which included in its defense budgets the "Pacific deterrence plan" of drastically
reinforcing its military presence in the Indo-Pacific region in recently years, has annually
increased the allotment for carrying it out. This predicts that the U.S. and its vassal countries
would more openly engage in military intervention in the Korean peninsula and its vicinity.
The prevailing situation requires the independent and sovereign states to constantly maintain
the balance of power for preventing a war by stockpiling the greatest deterrence for
guaranteeing their sovereignty, security and interests in every way in the current and future
uncertain security environment.
The more frequently the U.S. and its vassal countries commit collective military provocations,
the stronger the deterrence of justice for neutralizing the threat there from and ensuring
regional and global peace and stability will become.
We will continue to make crucial efforts to build up strong defence capabilities for creditably
defending our state sovereignty, security, interests and territorial integrity and change the
security environment of the Korean peninsula and the region in our favour. -0-